Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[Download] "Maclaren v. Windram Mfg. Co." by Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts # Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Maclaren v. Windram Mfg. Co.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Maclaren v. Windram Mfg. Co.
  • Author : Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
  • Release Date : January 29, 1934
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 66 KB

Description

CROSBY, Justice. This is an action of contract by which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract. The case was tried in the Superior Court before a jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $6,890.68. The case is before this court upon a report of the presiding Judge. The report recites that a few days prior to November 1, 1928, the plaintiff suggested to the defendant, through its president, the manufacture of material for raincoats, and as a result of these conversations the parties on that date entered into an oral contract by which it was agreed that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff a commission of ten per cent. on all sales of raincoat fabrics made by the defendant anywhere in the United States or Canada, during the period of one year expiring October 31, 1929. Upon the making of the contract the plaintiff entered upon his duties and expended time and money on marketing the new raincoat material. Owing to the fact that experimentation was required before suitable materials were produced several weeks elapsed before samples were available for the trade, and as a result commissions did not accrue to the plaintiff until about February 1, 1929. During the spring of 1929 controversies arose between the plaintiff and the defendant company, acting through its president, over the payment of commissions to the plaintiff on certain orders sold in the Boston territory on which, the defendant contended, the plaintiff was not entitled to a commission. Frequent Discussions were had between the parties with reference to the terms of the plaintiff's oral contract with the defendant, and early in June, 1929, the president of the defendant company notified the plaintiff that the board of directors had instructed him to make no further payments to the plaintiff for goods sold in the Boston territory. The plaintiff thereupon replied to the effect that he was surprised that the president should so treat a salesman and permit the board of directors to ignore a contract which their president had made, and that if the president meant to be fair with the plaintiff rather than to attempt to take away part of his territory covered by the contract, he should give him an extension of time under the contract to compensate him for the period lost at the beginning of the term because of time necessarily consumed in perfecting the samples of merchandise, and to compensate him for travelling expenses and automobile expenses; the plaintiff contended that commissions up to then were scarcely enough to cover expenses. The president replied that he felt sure the board of directors would not extend the contract, at least so far as the Boston territory was concerned, but that he would take the matter up with them and see what he could do as to an extension for the rest of the country.


Download Free Books "Maclaren v. Windram Mfg. Co." PDF ePub Kindle